NEET Protest, Social Media and the Frustration of a Generation

---

NEET Protests, Social Media and the Frustrations of a Generation

The recent protests over the NEET paper leak have once again brought India's youth into the spotlight. While discussing the issue with a fellow golfer today, I realised that two different concerns are often getting mixed together.

The first concern is genuine. A paper leak strikes at the very heart of meritocracy. Lakhs of students spend years preparing for a highly competitive examination. If the integrity of the examination is compromised, every honest student becomes a victim. On this point, there should be no disagreement. Transparency, accountability and swift punishment of those responsible are essential.

The second concern is the role of social media in shaping protests. Today, many young people receive information through reels, memes, WhatsApp forwards, Instagram and Facebook. Social media can spread awareness rapidly, but it can also reward sensationalism over substance.

Recently, one reel creator reportedly admitted on camera that she had posted an objectionable remark about the Prime Minister. Although she later deleted it, others had already downloaded and circulated the clip widely. Whether done for attention, political reasons or simply poor judgement, it illustrates how a few seconds of content can acquire a life of its own. In the age of algorithms, outrage often travels faster than facts.

This raises an important question. Are all participants in protests motivated by the issue itself, or are some also driven by the lure of online visibility? The answer is probably both. It would be unfair to dismiss every young protester as a "reel generation", just as it would be naïve to ignore the incentives created by social media platforms.

During my conversation, my golfing friend remarked that "such paper leaks don't happen in the First World." I partly agreed but added an important qualification.

Many developed countries do not have a single nationwide, ultra-competitive medical entrance examination comparable to NEET because their demographic situation and admission systems are different. Countries such as the United Kingdom generally admit medical students based on school examination results, aptitude tests like the UCAT, personal statements and interviews. In the United States, students enter medical school after completing an undergraduate degree, with admissions based on college performance, the MCAT, recommendations and interviews. Similar multi-factor admission systems exist in several other developed nations.

These countries certainly face issues such as academic misconduct or cheating, but the nature of the admission process is different. They do not usually have one examination taken by over two million candidates on a single day, making the challenges of administration fundamentally different from India's.

India's challenge is unique. We have an enormous young population competing for a limited number of quality seats. This intense competition creates tremendous pressure on students, parents, coaching institutes and, unfortunately, criminal networks seeking to exploit the system.

The lesson is not to blame an entire generation. Young people are understandably anxious because opportunities are limited while aspirations are limitless. Equally, social media should not become a substitute for thoughtful debate. Protest has an important place in democracy, but facts, responsibility and civility must remain at its core.

The real battle is not between generations. It is between integrity and corruption, between informed discussion and viral misinformation. If India can protect the credibility of its examinations while expanding educational opportunities, both students and society will be the winners.